A Closed Campus Cannot Become a Substitute for Resolution — Editorial by Khazi Altaf Hussian

07-November-2026

Reports published on 6 November state that the Satyajit Ray Film and Television Institute has extended its campus closure until 11 December amid continuing protests. An institute official described a review with academic deans, while students have criticised the administration’s approach. Those competing accounts require fair examination; allegations should not be presented as established findings.

The Education Times believes safety and academic continuity must be addressed together. Where temporary restrictions are necessary, an institution should explain how they contribute to a credible route towards reopening.

For practical disciplines, access to studios, equipment and supervised work is central to education. The consequences of a prolonged interruption cannot be assessed solely through an administrative closure date.

The Education Times questions what students can expect during the intervening period. Is there an academic recovery plan? How will practical work and assessments be protected? What independent process can examine safety concerns and disputed conduct?

Neither institutional authority nor student grievance should be exempt from evidence and fair procedure.

The Education Times recommends structured dialogue, a time-bound examination of the concerns and published milestones for restoring academic activity. Student welfare arrangements and support contacts should remain clear throughout.

The governing authorities should communicate progress without prejudging individual responsibility.

A campus crisis requires more than an extension order. Students deserve a credible path back to safe learning, and the institution must show how it intends to deliver one.